Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03752
Original file (BC 2012 03752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03752 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He attended the transition assistance program prior to his 
retirement and was briefed that he would be allowed to transfer 
his benefits; however, the guidelines had not been established 
yet. Had he known these transfers had to be done while on 
active duty he would have done so. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force in the grade of 
master sergeant effective 1 Feb 2005. 

 

Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed 
Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on 
or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states that the 
applicant was not on active duty on or after 1 Aug 2009, 
therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his 
dependents. The applicant provides no evidence of error or 
injustice on the part of the Air Force. 

 

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 11 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03752 in Executive Session on 3 Jun 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-03752: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Aug 2012. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 29 Aug 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Sep 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03571

    Original file (BC-2012-03571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. The program for Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. On 31 August 2009, he elected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04093

    Original file (BC-2012-04093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After retiring and applying for one of his children to receive the benefit, he was told there was no record of his transaction. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03843

    Original file (BC-2012-03843.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03098

    Original file (BC-2012-03098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03098 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. There is no record of the applicant making a Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00168

    Original file (BC 2014 00168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request noting the applicant may not have received accurate information regarding transferring education benefits to his dependents. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03970

    Original file (BC-2012-03970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (38 USC 3319(b)(1). We took notice of the applicant’s complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05696

    Original file (BC 2012 05696.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05696 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. DPSIT states that the applicant retired effective 31 Jul 2009. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03357

    Original file (BC-2012-03357.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2006, when he retired he was never informed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) or anyone else that he was eligible for post retirement education benefits under any program subsequent, to include the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB); or that he could convert his MGIB to the Post-9/11 GI Bill; or that he could transfer his benefit to his dependents, or any family member so they could use his benefits. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01799

    Original file (BC-2012-01799.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01799 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. 2 If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03678

    Original file (BC-2012-03678.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 29 November 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 24 Aug 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Aug 12.